March For Equality Rally, 11/15/08 Eric Ethington
Archive for December, 2008
28 Dec
PUSH FOR GAY RIGHTS HAS REACHED….SOUP?
As some people may be aware, giant soup company Campbell recently started advertising in gay media, like The Advocate. The advertisements were like any other niche-style marketing campaign, and featured Chef Lea Forant with her son Eli and her partner Carolyn.
But even something this simple, has drawn the attention of the Christian-Conservative group American Family Association (AFA).
The AFA is famous for pushing companies to stop advertising in “pro-gay” media, we may recall their infamous 2 year boycott of Ford Motor Company (what, don’t you remember this?) which ended this past March when Ford stopped advertising in gay media. Although Ford stopped ALL of it’s niche-marketing campaigns because of the economy.
Or how about the oh-so-successful boycott of McDonalds? The 6 month boycott was ended in October when the AFA claimed that the McDonalds promised them they would remain neutral in the fight for LGBTQ rights (statement has never been confirmed by McDonalds).
But now they have turned their “powerful” gaze onto Campbell Soup Company. Writing in an Action Alert to their members, they claim that “Campbell Soup Company has openly begun helping homosexual activists push their agenda,” and that Campbell is giving “their approval the entire homosexual agenda.”
The AFA has even gone as far as to claim that, “Not only did the ads cost Campbell’s a chunk of money, but they also sent a message that homosexual parents constitute a family and are worthy of support.”
For their part, Campbell Soup Company is remaining steadfast of their position that they are trying to make more money, and that gay money is the same as straight money.
So there you have it, THE BATTLE RAGES ON! Ha Ha.
26 Dec
Senator Orrin Hatch Supports Gay Marriage?
In a recent posting on his weblog, Salt Lake Tribune writer Robert Gerhke wrote:
“I could be bitter. I seem to have been left of Sen. Orrin Hatch’s Christmas-card list this year. I’m told his staff even got copies of his new Christmas album. But super-secret sources leaked me a copy of the card that the senator sent out and pointed out an interesting feature.
The back of the card has a picture of the state’s senior senator, his
great wife, Elaine, and President George W. Bush, the lame Christmas duck. But what’s with those little diamond designs on either side of the
photo — the blue square with the yellow “equals” sign in the middle.
Looks familiar. Where have I seen that?
Oh, yeah. It’s the logo of the Human Rights Campaign, which, according
to the group’s Web site, is the nation’s largest organization “working
to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality.””
So does this mean that our illustrious conservative Utah senator is secretly pro LGBTQ rights? Probably not, but you know some staffer is in quite a bit of trouble!
http://blogs.sltrib.com/utahpolitics/2008/12/hatch-make-yuletide-gay.htm
21 Dec
Gay Rights Gain Ground With the UN Vote
The United States, specifically the Bush Administration drew world-wide criticism again this past Thursday (12/18/08) as it refused to endorse the declaration put forward by France seeking to decriminalize homosexuality in the world.
According to the NY Times, Rama Yade the French state secretary for human rights, and Maxime Verhagen,the Dutch foreign minister spoke out at a later press conference saying that they were disappointed in the U.S. for not supporting the French-proposed declaration. Scott Long of the Human Rights Watch said, “The Bush Administration is trying to come up with Christmas Presents for the religious right so it will be remembered.”
The declaration gained the support of 66 countries in the UN’s general assembly, most heavily from Europe and Latin America. But due to the opposition against it, including the United States, Russia, the Conference of Islamic States and the Catholic church the measure was forced to only be presented as a non-binding declaration, rather than a resolution.
An opposing statement was also read at the general assembly, and was supported by 60 countries. In part it read that the effort threatened to undermine the international framework of human rights by trying to normalize pedophilia.
But a lot of good came out of the discussion, according to many gay-rights groups. It was the first time LGBT rights have ever been openly discussed in the general assembly, and it gives hope to the nations of the world for the future of the human rights movement.
18 Dec
Orson Scott Card Shows Us How To Discriminate and Feel Good
In a recent article posted on the Mormon Times titled “Disagree, but don’t be unkind” Orson Scott Card again tried to define specifically why the LDS or Mormon church is opposed to Marriage Equality and homosexuality in general. He also added some personal examples detailing how he himself is definitely not a bigot or discriminatory. Let me share with you some quotes from that article:
“My family and I have close friends who are gay, some of whom have entered into lawful marriages. They know we don’t agree that their relationship is the same thing or should have the same legal status as our marriage, but we all accept that strong and clear difference of opinion and move on, continuing to respect and love each other for the values we share. Only when a gay friend demanded that I agree with his or her point of view or cease to be friends has the friendship ended. What is odd is that in every case they called me intolerant. They misunderstood the meaning of “tolerance.” ”
Let me just focus on this statement for a moment, because it’s something that I, as a resident of Utah, hear quite frequently as an example of how someone really isn’t intolerant. First, the 2nd sentence says that he and his wife are friends with a married gay couple even though they know that he doesn’t think they have the same relationship as he and his wife, and that their marriage should not be afforded the same legal status. This is the definition of intolerance! You CANNOT look at another person, and say or think that you for some reason are better than, and should have more rights than they do, and still insist that you’re filled with love towards them, and are not filled with the spirit of bigotry.
Mr. Card went on to say that he only cuts ties with a gay friend when they insist that he agrees with their opinion. And that makes them intolerant. Let me see if I can state this clearly. We, as the LGBTQ community are NOT seeking for the right to have more than 2 dogs. We are NOT seeking for the right to smoke in public buildings. We are fighting for our lives! This is not something that can be so easily brushed away as Mr. Card seems to think. We are fighting for our right to live, for our right not to be 2nd class citizens!
“It makes me sad when people are so intolerant that they cannot bear to be friends with anyone who disapproves of some action or opinion of theirs.”
I wonder how Mr. Card would feel if the country were to invalidate his life, and tell him he was no longer as good as everyone else? Is he honestly surprised that people don’t want to be around him when he tells them they, and their spouses are evil? That he can fight to take away their basic civil rights and then expect them to smile is astounding to me.
So just a quick word to everyone out there. Stop thinking that this is a small, or fly-by-night issue. We are talking about our rights as people, our rights as human beings, our rights as citizens of the United States of America. And I’m sorry, but no matter how much you shout, or wave your bibles around, you’re not any better than me.
I only addressed about a quarter of Mr. Card’s article here. To see the full article visit: http://www.mormontimes.com/mormon_voices/orson_scott_card/?id=4740
15 Dec
“Following Blindly” by Travis Horlacher
This was sent to me by Travis Horlacher, asking me to post it here. Feel free to post comments and I’ll forward them to him. -Eric
———————————————————————————————
I understand that you can actually feel that you are not following blindly because you are on the inside just like I was at one point in my life, but if you look at it from the perspective of someone outside of the church you might notice how it looks like you are indeed following blindly.
You aren’t making the decision to follow them blindly. Your decision to follow them has been made by all of your religious training (the scriptures that you and the people who have taught you find specific value in), but your decision to follow these leaders has indeed caused you to follow them “blindly” as many of us see it.
Some people have stated that they are just as confused by the decision as I am. What this tells me is that following these leaders’ decision to make what I see to be a bad decision is, in the case of these people, is not because they agree with the decision on their own but because their logic or the spirit tells them to ‘follow the prophet cause he knows the way’. What I’m seeing is that you may have made the nonblind (I think I just made up a word) decision to follow your prophet, but by doing so you are suddenly following that prophet blindly by doing what is told to you by that prophet despite any leanings you may have against the decision.
What I’m trying to say is that I understand that many of you have made a nonblind decision to follow the prophet, but doing so comes at the very high price of ‘following blindly’ if you do it in this manner.
I don’t mean this to be offensive, but this is how I feel about it and you have to know that if your reasoning behind supporting the church’s decision to politically support Proposition 8 in California is based on following the prophet then realize that it is hard for anyone else to agree with any assertions that you aren’t just following blindly. Your decision to follow isn’t blind, but when you actually do follow your following is just that, blind.
-Travis Horlacher
11 Dec
New Jersey Commission says YES to Gay Marriage
The New Jersey Civil Union Review Commission has announced that New Jersey Legislators should pass a law allowing same-sex couples to marry, stating that “This commission finds that the separate categorization established by the Civil Union Act invites and encourages unequal treatment of same-sex couples and their children.”
Surprisingly, the commission reached this decision unanimously, although (despite claims to the contrary) the members are varied politically. The AP reported that, “Six of the 13 members are members of the Corzine administration, which Steven Goldstein (vice-chair of the commission) points out went to court in 2006 to oppose gay marriage. The other seven are members of the public, including one Goldstein described as a “pro-life Republican,” AnnLynne Benson of Clementon.”
This is a landmark decision as it could encourage the NJ senate to pass a law allowing same-sex marriage, wheras up to this point all states which have allowed gay marriage (MASS, CT, CA) have done so resulting from court decisions.
The commission reported that it did not make the decision lightly, but gathered a high amount of public opinions through several public hearings on the matter. Roughly 150 people spoke over several months to the commission, and of those the commission reports that only 10 were opposed to gay marriage.
The most hardcore Republican on the commission, Annlynne Benson (pro-life and everything) told the AP that her views on gay people have evolved over the past 15 years as she’s gotten to know more of them. This should be a BIG HINT to the rest of the nation! Talking to your neighbors and your community is an important thing! The more people know about you, your political views, and even your sexual orientation, the less and less the issue is removed from their minds, and the easier it is to show people how important equality is.
11 Dec
Religious Leaders Condemn the Vatican and the United States
In a joint statement on Dec 10th, 2008 the following was released in response to the UN resolution to decriminalize homosexuality (see https://ethingtoneric.wordpress.com/2008/12/10/un-to-vote-on-gay-rights-us-stays-silent/) by Reverend Rebecca Voelkel, Institute for Welcoming Resources and faith work director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force; Harry Knox, director of Religion and Faith Program of the Human Rights Campaign; Ann Craig, director of Religion , Faith and Values Program of the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation; and Sylvia Rhue, Ph.D., director of Religious Affairs of the National Black Justice Coalition.
“For far too long people around the world have been ostracized, imprisoned, tortured and denied basic rights to housing, health care and employment simply because they are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT). In more than 70 countries people can be imprisoned for homosexuality and in several countries it is a crime punishable by death.
“This is why the French government, backed by 27 European Union nations, put forward a proposal, on Human Rights Day to recognize that LGBT rights are human rights and to decriminalize homosexuality. Such a statement simply affirms the most basic of rights for LGBT people: that they be allowed to live in dignity and safety. As faith leaders who work every day with LGBT people who feel the stigma of discrimination, this U.N. initiative speaks to our core belief that we show our love for God when we care for our neighbors, particularly those who are shunned and marginalized.
“As faith leaders we were shocked by Vatican opposition to this proposed initiative. By refusing to sign a basic statement opposing inhumane treatment of LGBT people, the Vatican is sending a message that violence and human rights abuses against LGBT people are acceptable. Most Catholics, and indeed most Catholic teachings, tell us that all people are entitled to live with basic human dignity without the threat of violence. The Catholics we know believe that Scripture asks us to be our brother and our sister’s keeper. Many are speaking out against this immoral stance in the name of religion. We urge Vatican leaders to speak out against imprisonment or execution of gay people and support this initiative.
“Compounding the Vatican’s opposition is the inaction to date of the government of the United States. As faith leaders and citizens of the United States, we call on the U.S. government to join the 50 countries throughout the world that have officially supported this U.N. proposal.
“We urge U.S. leaders to stand against discrimination. It is time to let the teachings of the world’s great religions guide us toward justice rather that encouraging prejudice, fear and violence. It is time for the U.S. to stand as a moral leader for all people and to help create a more just world for all of us.”
10 Dec
UN To Vote On Gay Rights, U.S. Stays Silent
During a UN session between Dec 15th and 20th, the United Nations General Assembly is expected to table for the first time ever a declaration that would decriminalize homosexuality in all member nations.
The declaration is being put forward by France, after a big push by French Gay Rights and Black activist Louis-Georges Tin (http://www.idahomophobia.org). The declaration currently has support of roughly 54 nations, including all 27 members of the European Union (EU).
Notably however, many nations are remaining silent, although not opposed to the issue, including the United States, China and Cuba. There is a coalition forming opposing the measure however, headed by the Vatican and the Organization of Islamic States. The vatican released a statement effectively stating that it was opposed to the discrimination this declaration would pose to nations that have laws making homosexuality illegal. “.. protecting LGBT people against discrimination is an act of discrimination against those who discriminate. Since the Vatican is against discrimination, it opposes discrimination against countries that discriminate. This is the mediaeval mindset of the Pope and his placemen” said Peter Tatchell of the London based LGBT rights group “OutRage.”
Personally I find it incredibly interesting that the United States is the ONLY western democratic nation that is refusing the support the measure. What does it say about us that we claim to be the “land of the free” but cannot even support the legalization of human rights? America is getting closer and closer to supporting equal rights within it’s own borders, but when it comes to international affairs, we fall up short to Bosnia and Japan (both of whom are supporting the declaration).
This is the first time the UN has ever discussed LGBT rights, and with a few days left before it comes up, I say HOORAH to those nations willing to say that the days of segregation, hate, and discrimination ARE OVER!!!